| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 7:04 pm Post subject: 121 |
|
|
Originally posted by Borodog: Is it OK for a capricorn and a leo to get married?
No. They're child would be the Antichrist.
Uh-oh. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pikachamp
swore in chat!
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 8:29 pm Post subject: 122 |
|
|
| *still doesn't understand mathematical determinism* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lepton
1:41+ Arse Scratcher
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:22 pm Post subject: 123 |
|
|
| Quote: |
quote: Personally, I'm a fan of the Project Orion; nuclear blast propulsion. |
Ah, like in Footfall. Certainly would provide more acceleration than lightsail.
Acceleration, eh?
~begins re-fitting Mazda 323 with better door seals, patches holes in exhaust and oil pan, waxes hood, paints "Lepton2k" on hood~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:25 pm Post subject: 124 |
|
|
| Yeah, acceleration. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pikachamp
swore in chat!
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:57 pm Post subject: 125 |
|
|
| can black holes really create entire new universes? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack Crazyquilt
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2002 1:05 am Post subject: 126 |
|
|
| Most of this astrophsycal stuff is way over my head, but I've always been fasinated with it anyway. My question: what exactly is a Quasar (sp?) Is it just a really bright star or galaxy or what? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lucky Wizard
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2002 6:16 am Post subject: 127 |
|
|
pika: Lepton is basically just asking if it's possible to create a set of mathematical equations to predict your behavior.
Jack: Welcome to the GL! This page goes into some detail: http://www.phys.vt.edu/~jhs/faq/quasars.html
Which brings me to yet another question for Boro. What exactly is a BL Lacertae object? Why do astronomers make a distinction between a quasar and a BL Lacertae object?
[This message has been edited by Lucky Wizard (edited 11-28-2002 01:30 AM).] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lucky Wizard
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 7:49 pm Post subject: 128 |
|
|
| Did I kill this conversation? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 10:59 pm Post subject: 129 |
|
|
| Patience. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rOver
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 5:58 pm Post subject: 130 |
|
|
Ok. this thread made me post on GL after some time
Borodog: Do you think tax money should be spent on astrophysical reaserch? If yes why? If not what are the alternatives of financing?
What are the most important discoveries of the last 10 years (in Astrophysics)? Is dark energy among them or am I completly off? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnny
Cheesy Newbie Abuser
|
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 7:13 pm Post subject: 131 |
|
|
| (If not already mentioned) What are your thoughts on the multi-verse theory, and what shape is this multiverse? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 10:48 pm Post subject: 132 |
|
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
firemeboy
Daedalian Member
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ferris
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 2:37 am Post subject: 134 |
|
|
Before then, it would probably be used to provide fuel for return trips to Earth from Mars, and water for astronauts stationed on Mars.
Producing the fuel in situ cuts down considerably on costs and in this case, would possibly eliminate the need to transport 'feeder' H2 to Mars. (Using H2 with the CO2 found in Mars' atmosphere in a 'Water Gas Reaction' would produce carbon monoxide and water - the first step in a series of reactions to form pure oxygen.)
If it's possible to use the water that's already there, then ultimately, Mars is an even better bet as a long-term manned research location than previously thought.
Sorry Borodog, I know it's not my hotseat - but I'll try to redeem myself by asking, "Do you support the idea of 'Mars Direct'? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
firemeboy
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 3:11 pm Post subject: 135 |
|
|
| I bet there will be people who claim we shouldn't mess with the atmosphere of mars. They'll take the 'we've ruined this planet, let's not ruin more' approach. I don't see a problem with it at all, especially given the fact there is no known life on mars.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lepton
1:41+ Arse Scratcher
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 6:05 am Post subject: 136 |
|
|
...we shouldn't mess with the atmosphere of mars...
I couldn't stand to see this go to page 2 so soon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
One Skunk Todd
Smelly Member
|
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2002 3:17 pm Post subject: 137 |
|
|
How can black holes evaporate?
What is the heat-death of the universe?
What will happen to the remaining matter after the heat death of the universe? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lepton
1:41+ Arse Scratcher
|
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2002 7:36 pm Post subject: 138 |
|
|
As described by Stephen Hawking, Black Holes 'leak' because of quantum fluctuations near the event horizon. Everywhere, Virtual particle/antiparticle pairs are being created and annilihated shortly thereafter. They sort of borrow energy from the vacuum, which makes sense if you know lots of quantum mechanics. Sometimes, one of these Virtual particles falls into a black hole and the other one escapes off into space before they annilihate. Since the vacuum must remain massless and energyless, it is as if the lack hole was leaking a particle.
[/hijack] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
One Skunk Todd
Smelly Member
|
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2002 8:33 pm Post subject: 139 |
|
|
I was with you until here:
| Quote: |
| Since the vacuum must remain massless and energyless, it is as if the lack hole was leaking a particle. |
Any way to make it simpler? Or expand on it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Will
Won't
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 5:15 am Post subject: 140 |
|
|
| why is shapeshifting impossible? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Irma
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2002 10:53 pm Post subject: 141 |
|
|
| Who says it is? *howls at the moon* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lucky Wizard
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2002 12:39 am Post subject: 142 |
|
|
All right, since Borodog hasn't posted, I'll answer Will's question. bump
Will: Basically, any change that takes place requires some form of energy to start the change, be it a physical or chemical change. And shape-shifting is a mega-change, since energy is needed to do all these things:
- break many bonds between atoms in the body, so these atoms may recombine in a way that creates something new.
- change some atoms of certain elements into atoms of other elements, so these atoms may have the correct proportions for whatever you want to change to.
- move all the atoms around to where they have to be (admittedly not much energy, but I'm including this anyway).
- annihilate some atoms into energy or procure new atoms out of energy - or else put atoms in the air or get them from the air. (Yes, energy is needed to start the process of annihilating atoms into energy.)
This requires mega-amounts of energy. The amount of energy required is so huge that I would go out on a limb and say that it could not possibly be procured. Also, it would require extremely immense amounts of special equipment.
And as for quantum effects... I suppose it could happen, but only by chance -- and that's extremely unlikely: odds are probably on the order of a googolplex to one against -- and I would think it is impossible to control.
[This message has been edited by Lucky Wizard (edited 12-27-2002 07:40 PM).] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pikachamp
swore in chat!
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2002 1:07 am Post subject: 143 |
|
|
| what do you mean by quantum effect? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Borodog
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2002 3:12 am Post subject: 144 |
|
|
This is why I stopped posting to this thread . . .
------------------
Insert humorous sig here.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
casinopete
Emergency Backup Antrax
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2002 3:30 am Post subject: 145 |
|
|
hey, hey
i have a not-astrophysics question that is still somewhat topical.
does anyone know where i can find a "fairly good" 3D-animation (any format) of a sun?
(you know, surface blazing and popping and all)
preferably one in which you can move the camera in/out/around?
i'm only asking here because i think Boro (if anyone) would be likely to have run across one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
One Skunk Todd
Smelly Member
|
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 6:01 pm Post subject: 146 |
|
|
| Why is the moon receding from the earth? Is there an energy loss/gain in the system somewhere? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Borodog
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 8:46 pm Post subject: 147 |
|
|
Yes, tidal drag by the moon is slowing the rotation of the Earth and causing the moon to recede at the same time.
------------------
Insert humorous sig here.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
One Skunk Todd
Smelly Member
|
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 8:50 pm Post subject: 148 |
|
|
| So at some point the earth will stop rotating with respect to the moon and they will both constantly present the same side to each other? And the moon will stop receding at that point? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Borodog
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 9:02 pm Post subject: 149 |
|
|
Yes, but the moon will probably have been kicked loose by gravitational perturbations from Jupiter by then, or the whole lot will have been swallowed by the sun.
------------------
Insert humorous sig here.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
casinopete
Emergency Backup Antrax
|
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2003 2:53 am Post subject: 150 |
|
|
A friend and I are writing a comic book in which the bad guy gets ahold of a device that lets him increase Planck's Constant.
Since we want the machine to be engaged at some point, but without the world ending instantly, we assume it won't be really destructive. ie. we assume all atoms won't disassociate themselves into ions.
What we are looking for a bunch of semi-pseudo-scientific effects that would be fun to put in our story. We have two so far:
1) As instants of time become more discrete from one another, complex probabilities simplify, and someone with a very powerful computer poised to take advantage of this will be able to dominate "random" things like the stock market or casino gambling (this is the core of our Bad Guy's Master Plan).
2) The discrete bundles of energy required to free electrons would get bigger, causing fewer perceptable colors (and changing what's there) - so, as our hero and villain's goon are struggling at the device, we can change colors around in each panel.
Ideally, these effects will be humorous or visually appealing, and not too difficult to explain in notes at the end.
so. . . any suggestions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ferris
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2003 8:26 pm Post subject: 151 |
|
|
Borodog,
A serious question for you. I've been re-reading "Theories of Everything" by John D. Barrow and came across a fascinating chapter which dealt with physical constants and, amongst other things, how carbon comes to be so abundant in the universe due to the property of resonance in the nuclear reaction which forms it.
| Quote: |
| The size of all astronomical bodies are determined by the relative values of the fine- structure and the gravitational constants alone. |
The fine-structure constant is described as being equal to eČ/ch where e is the charge on an electron, c is the speed of light and h is Plank's constant of quantum theory, but the book doesn't make any effort to derive this formula. My chemistry knowledge is enough to grasp the fundamentals of resonance, and I can understand the principle of astronomical size being related to the balance of fine- and gravitational forces, but I'd like to know a bit more about where the fine-structure constant comes from. At the moment, it's a bit of a 'magic formula' to me.
------------------
nec sorte nec fato
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2003 8:33 pm Post subject: 152 |
|
|
| Here's a hint: Boyle & Charles |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Borodog
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2003 9:13 pm Post subject: 153 |
|
|
I'll have to look it up, but that's part of the point of the fine structure constant, it is sort of "magic." Why does it equal 1/137? We don't know.
------------------
Insert humorous sig here.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Werebear
Daedalian Member
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VinnyQ
Vi Ni Kiu
|
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 3:04 pm Post subject: 155 |
|
|
Some one ought to move this thread to Educator Idea. We keep losing it to the obscurity of page 2 in OT.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Borodog
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 3:46 pm Post subject: 156 |
|
|
Sure.
------------------
Insert humorous sig here.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mikko
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 5:38 pm Post subject: 157 |
|
|
| How does gravity reach a body? I mean e.g. how does the moon, or the particles that it consists of, "know" where the earth and sun are and what mass they have? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pikachamp
swore in chat!
|
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 5:47 pm Post subject: 158 |
|
|
it's all in einsteins general theory of relativity
the earth warps space, and the warp in space pulls you in |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
extropalopakettle
No offense, but....
|
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 6:00 pm Post subject: 159 |
|
|
| The earth is here, and the space that it warps is over there. So how does it do it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pikachamp
swore in chat!
|
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 6:19 pm Post subject: 160 |
|
|
| if i have a stretched out piece of stretchy stuff, and a ball on one end, i can use my finger to push down on the other end of the stretchy stuff and it'll roll to my finger! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|