| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2002 1:13 am Post subject: 1 |
|
|
... that Tim Krabbe has put his site back up (see OT). Taken from the Dutch part of his site:
Chess Board








WKd2,WQf5,WRa4,WNc2,BKb1,BQa8,BNc7,BBa3,
BBc4,BPa2,BPb2,BPb5,BPd5,BPg4,BPh5
White to play (from bottom to top) and mate in 5 (Siers, 1959)
[This message has been edited by Dragon Phoenix (edited 04-28-2002 09:14 PM).] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ctrlaltdel
Member of the Daedalians
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2002 6:50 am Post subject: 2 |
|
|
huh???
am i missing something again???
white has a mate in two!
1. Nxa3++ Ka1
2. Qb1# |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mole
Subterranean Member
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2002 6:54 am Post subject: 3 |
|
|
| 2... axb1 maybe? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ctrlaltdel
Member of the Daedalians
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2002 7:27 am Post subject: 4 |
|
|
| heck thats right... and it even says white playing from bottom up, DUHH |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
borschevsky
Chessnut
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:28 pm Post subject: 5 |
|
|
Yes, but if axb1=Q then 3.Nc2 is mate, no?
However:
2..axb1=N and white has no mate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
borschevsky
Chessnut
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:33 pm Post subject: 6 |
|
|
| Well, Qf1 would be mate right now if it wasn't for the Bc4, so maybe RxB to remove the bishop, or just Qf2 to try for Qe1# next. But in both cases black can just go a1 to open a hole on a2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
borschevsky
Chessnut
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:49 pm Post subject: 7 |
|
|
Oh, what about...
1. Qf2 a1=Q (to stop Qe1#)
2. Qf5! to re-threaten discoveries by the knight
If black does nothing constructive, then 3. Nb4+ and Qc2# (black can waste a move with Bd3 but white is in time)
2...Qa2
3.Nxa3+ Ka1 4.Qb1! Qxb1 5.Nc2#
I don't think I've checked all the variations, but that has to be right. It's too pretty to have a refutation . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:54 pm Post subject: 8 |
|
|
Yes, that's correct. Well done - as expected!
The theme is that the black pawn does not promote but degrade to a queen. When the new black queen comes to a2 where the pawn came from, it is less powerful than the pawn - it cannot promote to a knight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ctrlaltdel
Member of the Daedalians
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2002 9:58 pm Post subject: 9 |
|
|
heres one variation...
1. Qf2! a1N
2. Qe1+ Ka2
3. Qxa1+ Kb3
4. Rxa3+ Qxa3
5. Qxa3#
[This message has been edited by ctrlaltdel (edited 04-29-2002 05:58 PM).] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Coyote

|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2002 12:26 am Post subject: 10 |
|
|
Believe it or not, I even 'read' the in het Nederlands section of Tim Krabbe's site (after all Chess is a universal language). That's why I didn't bother sticking my nose in this one.
Incidentally, the 'loss of promotion rights' idea has been done before. This one is an especially nice example though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Coyote

|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2002 12:30 am Post subject: 11 |
|
|
Oops, just scrolled back up and checked the date of the problem's publication...disregard that 'has been done before' bit.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|