| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:28 pm Post subject: 1 |
|
|
It's our second cryptic writing contest!
How it works:
1) Entrants should sign up in this thread. Cryptic sign-ups are encouraged.
2) I will assign a list of 10 words that entrants will write clues for.
3) All entrants will PM the clues they write to me, along with explanations.
4) I will post the clues and explanations in this thread. In addition to the clues written by the GL, I'll include a clue published in a respected crossword for each word.
5) All entrants will rank the top three clues for each solution. Those who did not submit cryptic clues may participate in the voting.
6) I will then tabulate the scores, awarding 3 points for Gold, 2 for Silver, 1 for Bronze, and 0 for any clues that miss the podium.
7) Highest combined score wins. We'll award three medals for each individual solution, three for the highest scoring individual clues overall, and three overall medals based on combined score from all clues.
Deadline for cryptic submissions is 11:59pm (GMT -4) on Monday 8/20.
Participants:
1) 3iff
2) novice
3) Zag
4) Amb
5) Jack_Ian
6) Vagrant
7) Elethiomel
8) Scurra
9) Thok
10) groza528
11) esme
12) Dej Mar
13)
14) Published crossword clue
Word List:
DEARTH
DISPLEASE
EXPLOIT
IMPROMPTU
NASCENT
NIGHT
NIKE
REALM
SHOT
TRANSPOSITION _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature.
Last edited by Suspence on Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:54 am; edited 20 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:36 pm Post subject: 2 |
|
|
I'll progress from spectator to participant...I aim to finish higher than last place...
(I'd prefer that the explanations are not published before the voting.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
novice
No harm. Pun intended!
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:46 pm Post subject: 3 |
|
|
| Finishing second, not first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:48 pm Post subject: 4 |
|
|
I will make explanations invisible. You may avoid them if you wish. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:56 pm Post subject: 5 |
|
|
| I'm hoping I'll see some time free up. BTW, I love the idea of adding clues from a published puzzle. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:02 pm Post subject: 6 |
|
|
Tree planted on roadway. This is where I will finish! (5)
Minute part of your placing. (6) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:25 am Post subject: 7 |
|
|
| Heighten third last! (2) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elethiomel
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:28 am Post subject: 8 |
|
|
| I'll play, with an open mind. (2) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vagrant
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:41 am Post subject: 9 |
|
|
| In smidgeon? (2,4,2,2) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scurra
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:56 pm Post subject: 10 |
|
|
Going for topless win _________________
still Quiz Olympiad champion. Must get a life.
New definitions: COFFEE - someone who is coughed upon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:17 pm Post subject: 11 |
|
|
Word list is:
DEARTH
DISPLEASE
EXPLOIT
IMPROMPTU
NASCENT
NIGHT
NIKE
REALM
SHOT
TRANSPOSITION
Many thanks for Vagrant for providing a source for the published clues for these solutions.
Deadline for cryptic submissions is 11:59pm (GMT -4) on Thursday 8/16. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:20 pm Post subject: 12 |
|
|
We'll still accept anyone who would like to enter, but please post here first. At some point we may need to cap the number of entrants. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thok
Oh, foe, the cursed teeth!
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:03 pm Post subject: 13 |
|
|
I'm in, if you'll forgive my only sending in half the words last time.
Edit: I've even written two clues so far. Go me.
Edit Edit: Up to 5.
Last edited by Thok on Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:41 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:18 pm Post subject: 14 |
|
|
Sure. That makes 10 with the published clue. I'll take two more entrants if any are interested. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:27 pm Post subject: 15 |
|
|
Just a reminder - please provide explanations for each clue. I'll likely standardize them to ensure total anonymity for the writers, but this will be much easier for me if you provide me something to work from.
As I said, I'll invis the explanations for any who prefer to work without them. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
groza528
No Place Like Home
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:37 am Post subject: 16 |
|
|
OK, I'm in again, and I'm going to make it this time.
[edit]Half done already [/edit] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
novice
No harm. Pun intended!
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 2:56 pm Post subject: 17 |
|
|
| Six out of ten now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:47 pm Post subject: 18 |
|
|
I might have to bow out - Leaving for an island for 10 days with no coverage.
If I can find any coverage I'll submit an entry.
I'll try to put something together tonight before I leave, but I've got a lot of packing to do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:09 pm Post subject: 19 |
|
|
| Came across with removed glycogen storage organ? (9) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vagrant
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 10:32 pm Post subject: 20 |
|
|
I'm probably gonna change some of my submitted clues.
Do you prefer to just receive the changed clues or do you want the full list with the changed clues replaced? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 10:34 pm Post subject: 21 |
|
|
| I'm a bit behind on making my clues. I'll have another go tonight, but if I don't finish, would there be any objection to requesting a change to the deadline till after the weekend rather than Thursday? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:41 am Post subject: 22 |
|
|
| None here. I'd rather people have time to polish. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:03 am Post subject: 23 |
|
|
I've done mine...and will send them in soon.
Extending the deadline is fine by me...no point in rushing this part of the game.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elethiomel
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:11 am Post subject: 24 |
|
|
| I'm also done, though I haven't submitted yet, in case I want to do some final polishing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
novice
No harm. Pun intended!
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:29 am Post subject: 25 |
|
|
| I've done 9 out of 10... Kind of stuck on the tenth, it's a challenge for my creativity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
esme
^^^^-- is female! Get the pronouns right
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:32 am Post subject: 26 |
|
|
| I would like to participate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:55 pm Post subject: 27 |
|
|
Answering some questions from several previous posts.
1) If you rework some clues, sending the whole list again is the easiest for me.
2) Deadline extended til next Monday at midnight.
3) OK, esme, you have a spot. Please submit your clues before the deadline. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 4:05 pm Post subject: 28 |
|
|
FYI, I just received a submission from Dej Mar, who hasn't previously posted in this thread (or anywhere on the GL, except as a guest). Welcome, Dej Mar.
That puts us up to 13 entries including the published clue.
Does anyone see a need to revise the scoring method given the number of entries? I suppose we could vote by giving every clue a score on a 0-10 scale... _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 6:58 am Post subject: 29 |
|
|
| I'd prefer the old system gold/silver/bronze. Trying to pick three good ones is tough. Trying to score every clue for a word would be harder/more work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
novice
No harm. Pun intended!
|
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:19 am Post subject: 30 |
|
|
| I wouldn't mind having to award a fourth place as well, though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 2:05 pm Post subject: 31 |
|
|
OK, I'll think about ways to revise it just slightly and keep you all posted.
I'm interested to see if the published clues are going to win. I like all of them, but the one limitation I had in making my selections as my own ability to parse them. It could be I left some really great ones on the table since I couldn't crack them. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:53 pm Post subject: 32 |
|
|
Since I have seen more than one in the submitted clues, perhaps we should discuss indirect anagrams here. What are the thoughts/feelings about them?
Here's what I have seen about them from cryptipedia...
An indirect anagram is a type of anagram in which a synonym or other subsidiary indication is given partially or wholly as the anagram fodder.
Example: Unusually tough monster (5)
The solver is expected first to find the synonym HARDY for "tough", and then to anagram it to give the answer HYDRA, as opposed to being given the clue "Unusually hardy monster (5)", in which the letters to be anagrammed are provided.
During the formative years of the modern cryptic clue, indirect anagrams were commonplace; it was not until Ximenes' On the Art of the Crossword was published in 1966 that indirect anagrams began to be widely considered unfair to the solver.
The end result of this controversy is not a global ban on indirect anagrams, but general agreement that they are unfair and excessively difficult, which has lead to their disuse in almost all major cryptic crosswords.
I believe I have seen indirect anagrams panned on this site. How would the scorers feel about clues involving indirect anagrams? _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
novice
No harm. Pun intended!
|
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:58 pm Post subject: 33 |
|
|
| Seems a bit odd to be discussing this prior to scoring. But I might as well volunteer that indirect anagrams are a big no-no in my book. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:17 pm Post subject: 34 |
|
|
| novice wrote: |
| Seems a bit odd to be discussing this prior to scoring. But I might as well volunteer that indirect anagrams are a big no-no in my book. |
I struggled with that, but I thought we should be fair to setters who may not know this. I know it took me awhile (and getting panned here, IIRC) to figure out that this was frowned upon when I started trying to write cryptics. I have a feeling that any who submitted these did so without knowing how indirect anagrams are viewed. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:26 pm Post subject: 35 |
|
|
| novice wrote: |
| Seems a bit odd to be discussing this prior to scoring. But I might as well volunteer that indirect anagrams are a big no-no in my book. |
Seconded.
Tahnan write a good description of why they are so bad. The basic problem is that the author looks at Unusually tough monster (5) and thinks that it's so very obvious, but the solver has to say, "is 'unusually' really an anagram indicator or not? Of the dozens of synonyms for 'tough' which one do I need to anagram? It just makes for a search tree that is too large.
It's not quite so bad if the clue to the anagram fodder really has only one choice (i.e. pachyderm, not that I can think of something 'elephant' would anagram to), but it's best just to avoid them altogether. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 pm Post subject: 36 |
|
|
Indirect anagrams can be submitted, since the submitter will be aware it will be at the risk of actually getting any points.
Same as someone who doesnt put an anagram indicator. It's part of the reason I cannot believe "Criticized Debater!" got any votes at all in the last round - let alone gold. I disqualified it for not having any indicator. I wouldn't like to drive through an intersection near this person  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:36 pm Post subject: 37 |
|
|
Anything will be accepted. We'll even take clues for the wrong word I just thought new setters would appreciate the info. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
esme
^^^^-- is female! Get the pronouns right
|
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:34 pm Post subject: 38 |
|
|
| Amb wrote: |
Indirect anagrams can be submitted, since the submitter will be aware it will be at the risk of actually getting any points.
Same as someone who doesnt put an anagram indicator. It's part of the reason I cannot believe "Criticized Debater!" got any votes at all in the last round - let alone gold. I disqualified it for not having any indicator. I wouldn't like to drive through an intersection near this person  |
Then you disqualified it for the wrong reason."Criticized" is the anagram indicator, the only potential problem is the presence of "debater" in the literal reading of the phrase. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 12:49 am Post subject: 39 |
|
|
| I've seen some creative anagram indicators. I didn't see one in that clue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 1:04 am Post subject: 40 |
|
|
Isn't part of the problem with Criticized debater that the anagram indicator (assuming you are OK with "criticized" as an anagram indicator, which I think I am) is also the definition?
It reminds me of Flexible relatives (9) VERSATILE, which was called by some a "semi &lit" in the get a clue thread, and didn't really work overall. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|