The Grey Labyrinth is a collection of puzzles, riddles, mind games, paradoxes and other intellectually challenging diversions. Related topics: puzzle games, logic puzzles, lateral thinking puzzles, philosophy, mind benders, brain teasers, word problems, conundrums, 3d puzzles, spatial reasoning, intelligence tests, mathematical diversions, paradoxes, physics problems, reasoning, math, science.

   
The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Discussion about religion - from Serious Discussions
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Off-Topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Thok
Oh, foe, the cursed teeth!



PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:33 pm    Post subject: 81 Reply with quote

So what I get is that for 16 years (from 1616-1632) Galileo mostly held his tongue over a theory he thought was true, and the Church for all intents and purposes made it difficult for anybody to try and to compare Tycho and Copernicus's theory by declaring one heretical for some period of time from 1616 onward.

Oh, and that Galileo was censored for being an outspoken jerk who hurt some people's feelings.

Neither of these makes me favorable to the Church. That the Church was mostly smart enough not to get involved in other debates doesn't make up for the fact that it was involved in this debate.

Basically, I'd be as annoyed with the Church if they had declared plate tectonics heretical in 1922, and put Alfred Wegener under house arrest in 1930. In the real world, people took sides even though there was no real proof until the 1950's and the debate resolved itself in the 1960's.

Edit: I'll add that much of the basis of the "The Church wasn't so bad" argument is really "Fortunately, there was a lot of scientific investigation that could avoid biblical subjects, so scientists could do things without annoying the Church".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
extropalopakettle
No offense, but....



PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 12:36 am    Post subject: 82 Reply with quote

Thok wrote:
Edit: I'll add that much of the basis of the "The Church wasn't so bad" argument is really "Fortunately, there was a lot of scientific investigation that could avoid biblical subjects, so scientists could do things without annoying the Church".


That, and that even if it were a "biblical subject", if a scientific finding were to be shown to contradict something understood in the bible, then the Church's position was that the bible is not a literal account of scientific fact.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 12:59 am    Post subject: 83 Reply with quote

You say that because the Catholic Church has always been so relaxed about making metaphoric interpretation of the Bible? Tell that to all the early Lutherans who were killed for heresy for saying that Transubstantiation was not a literal thing, but just a metaphor.
_________________
Death Mage wrote:
I couldn't agree with you more, Zag.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
extropalopakettle
No offense, but....



PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:44 am    Post subject: 84 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
You say that because the Catholic Church has always been so relaxed about making metaphoric interpretation of the Bible?


Not at all, but in matters of science, facts are not denied for the sake of a literal interpretation. We still speak of the sun rising and setting in everyday discourse. The Church then, as today, understood that the Bible uses common language, and is not intended as a scientific physical description of the world.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 3:28 am    Post subject: 85 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
You say that because the Catholic Church has always been so relaxed about making metaphoric interpretation of the Bible? Tell that to all the early Lutherans who were killed for heresy for saying that Transubstantiation was not a literal thing, but just a metaphor.

If Transubstantiation is an edict from the Pope and therefore considered infallible, it's not surprising the Catholic Church was upset by that. I believe that would be a separate issue though.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
extropalopakettle
No offense, but....



PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:13 am    Post subject: 86 Reply with quote

Jedo the Jedi wrote:
I believe that would be a separate issue though.


When one issue don't stick, move to another.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_



PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 9:25 pm    Post subject: 87 Reply with quote

This article is a response to the Oatmeal's comic. I thought it was interesting and defense/viewpoint.
http://catholicdefense.blogspot.com/2012/07/a-catholic-reply-to-how-to-suck-at-your.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 9:39 pm    Post subject: 88 Reply with quote

That article is a little anxiety driven in its need to "defend the faith," but the ultimately good point is that the webcomic does set up a number of strawmen for its attack. I still thought it was funny though precisely because I know it doesn't affect my beliefs or religion.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous: by   
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Off-Topic All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Site Design by Wx3