| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 12:21 am Post subject: 1 |
|
|
Some time ago we were inundated with spambots, and we had to stop our forums being google-searchable. But this means we have less new blood and could ultimately lead to the demise of the forums.
I think it's time to reinstate that searchability?
Any one agree or am I as barking mad as a "Lightspeed isnt constant" scientist? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 1:39 am Post subject: 2 |
|
|
I support the change. I know I found GL by searching, way back when. It was probably AltaVista that I searched on, though.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 6:28 am Post subject: 3 |
|
|
I didn't even know we did that. I thought it was all the new captcha. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 7:24 am Post subject: 4 |
|
|
I'm kind of on the fence about it. I guess I'd say "let's see how it goes." I doubt the spam bots have gotten any less assaulting, but you're not wrong in needing more activity. _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 1:33 pm Post subject: 5 |
|
|
| I miss the Google-Searchability option. Especially since the forum's own search doesn't work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:42 am Post subject: 6 |
|
|
Can anyone confirm if the system excludes google searching?
It really would be great to lead us back into life before the days of bulletin boards fade away completely. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 2:17 am Post subject: 7 |
|
|
| I remember reading somewhere that the robots.txt document asks web crawlers to stay out of greylabyrinth.com/discussion |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:02 am Post subject: 8 |
|
|
| Amb wrote: |
Can anyone confirm if the system excludes google searching?
It really would be great to lead us back into life before the days of bulletin boards fade away completely. |
Oddly enough... anyone can confirm. (due to the very nature of the robots.txt file, it's a public ASCII readable text file that anyone can access.)
http://www.greylabyrinth.com/robots.txt
| Code: |
User-agent: *
Disallow: /discussion/
User-agent: Mediapartners-Google*
Disallow: |
This means that any/all agents (*) are disallowed access to everything in the /discussion folder. _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb*
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:59 am Post subject: 9 |
|
|
| I'd like to see this changed back. We need the new blood. And the * method on names, that I use right now, should help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:44 am Post subject: 10 |
|
|
| Maybe we could allow search engines to index GLP, VSP, GL news only. That would potentially attract people interested in puzzle and such. Allowing the content of Off Topic to be searched by Google might not be the best. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Courk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:45 am Post subject: 11 |
|
|
*agrees with amb*
Or amb*
Or maybe ambot? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:05 pm Post subject: 12 |
|
|
| Was this ever changed? I dont mind off topic and vg and what have being searchable. It's a struggle to get players in games now because of the lack of new blood. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 8:09 pm Post subject: 13 |
|
|
I also agree  _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neo
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:32 am Post subject: 14 |
|
|
I think somebody with FTP access has to make the change. Robots.txt is still the same. _________________
Ad Astra
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 1:14 am Post subject: 15 |
|
|
Im still following this up.
I disagree about limiting which forums to search though. Mafia and VG could do with more... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:57 pm Post subject: 16 |
|
|
I've either fixed this or just ordered a swarm of killbots. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Courk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 6:11 pm Post subject: 17 |
|
|
Thanks!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 12:52 pm Post subject: 18 |
|
|
Has anything changed? _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poisonium
annoyed by the old
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 1:36 pm Post subject: 19 |
|
|
I think it's a good idea, but then again, I'm not a moderator.
Although I found the website through a link from Wikipedia  _________________ I tried apt-get install lifebut it only returned E: Couldn't find package life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 3:09 pm Post subject: 20 |
|
|
Could one of the moderators please discipline Poisonium for expressing an opinion while not being a moderator? _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 3:33 pm Post subject: 21 |
|
|
Google finds GL when queried.
Is there really a problem here? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:11 pm Post subject: 22 |
|
|
| The problem is that Google isn't (or wasn't) generating any results from inside the forums themselves, which is where we want the Realpeople to visit. In any case, Antrax did change it ten days ago, so... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:21 am Post subject: 23 |
|
|
| It might take awhile for the spiders to come back to us. Until that moment, the change really hasn't happened at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:47 am Post subject: 24 |
|
|
The next feature that we might need is the requirement to have more than 5 posts before you can bump a thread more than a year old.
There is nothing wrong with bumping an old thread, but I have the feeling that our new blood may be finding topics that have already passed away... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:39 pm Post subject: 25 |
|
|
| MatthewV wrote: |
The next feature that we might need is the requirement to have more than 5 posts before you can bump a thread more than a year old.
There is nothing wrong with bumping an old thread, but I have the feeling that our new blood may be finding topics that have already passed away... |
I agree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:10 pm Post subject: 26 |
|
|
| Do it. Do it NOW! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:42 pm Post subject: 27 |
|
|
| It would probably be easier to prevent Icarian members from putting links in their sig or their notes. That would discourage the spammers from bothering to post in the first place, I would think. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:51 pm Post subject: 28 |
|
|
I think it would be easier to add the "old post" block. But I agree; blocking links more directly targets the issue.
You know....all these latest ones have the same email provider. That provider (out of India) has only slightly more than 300 employees. India has about a billion people, I bet more than 300 people meet with accidents on the way to work. Shame, I'm just sayin. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 6:35 pm Post subject: 29 |
|
|
| I have been noticing old thread being bumped more frequently. We really need some sort of old thread posting block for new members. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 4:21 pm Post subject: 30 |
|
|
I was thinking we should add something to block new members from posting in old threads. I've been seeing a lot of that lately. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itisally
Master of Disguise
|
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 3:02 am Post subject: 31 |
|
|
Just an Idea, but would it be possible to create a discussion archive. All discusions in it would be locked but it would still be available to refrence. _________________ I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:31 am Post subject: 32 |
|
|
So what would it take to prevent people with fewer than X posts from added to a topic that was older than Y days old? I doesn't really matter what X and Y are if they could be changed if current members feel restricted.
Personally I would set X=10 and Y= 365 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nsof
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:59 pm Post subject: 33 |
|
|
Should we allow robots to crawl our profiles?
If not we should update the disallow row to include discussion/profile.php _________________ Will sell this place for beer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:42 pm Post subject: 34 |
|
|
Er... could you send me the file you want in there and I'll upload it? I'm really not a net kind of guy  _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nsof
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 8:56 am Post subject: 35 |
|
|
I kind of missed your answer with all the other interesting threads.
I'll prepare and send it to you. _________________ Will sell this place for beer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|